![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Viitteet 1 Richardson MC. An in-vivo assessment of microbial proliferation under transparent film dressings. In: Maki DG (ed), International Congress and Symposia Series No. 179, ‘Improving Catheter Site Care’, Royal Society of Medicine Series. London, New York, 1991, 29–33. 2 Data on File Report PS/WR/01/11/003 dated December 2001 - The Moisture Vapour Transmission Rate (MVTR) of Permeable Film Dressings. 3 Treston-Aurand J. et al. Impact of dressing materials on central venous catheter infection rates. J Intravenous Nursing 1997; 20(4): 201–206. 4 Jones A. Dressings for the management of catheter sites – a review. JAVA 2004; 9(1): 1–8. 5 Campbell H, Carrington M. Peripheral IV cannula dressings: advantages and disadvantages. BJN 1999; 8:1420–1422, 1424–1427. 6 Tripepi-Bova KA et al. A comparison of transparent polyurethane and dry gauze dressings for peripheral IV catheter sites: Rate of phlebitis, infiltration and dislodgement by patients. Am J Crit Care 1997; 6: 377–381. 7 Data on File Report - 0505005, Smith & Nephew Wound Management May 2005. 8 Joyeaux B. OPSITE IV3000 versus Tegaderm on peripheral venous catheters. In: Maki DG (ed), International Congress and Symposia Series No. 179, ‘Improving Catheter Site Care’, Royal Society of Medicine Series. London, New York, 1991, 53–55. 9 Maki, D.G., Stoltz, S.- A prospective, randomised, three-way clinical comparison of a novel, highly permeable, polyurethane dressing with 206 Swan - Ganz pulmonary artery catheters: OPSITE IV3000 vs Tegaderm vs gauze and tape. 1991 10 Guidelines for working together to reduce Healthcare Associated Infection in England - Report from the Chief Medical Officer. Winning - Ways - UK Department of Health 2003. 11 Guidelines for Preventing Intravascular Catheter - related Infection, ICNA 2000, Fitwise Publications (III). 12 Dept of Health 2001. The Epic Project Developing national Guidelines for Preventing Healthcare Associated Infections. London Dept of Health. 13 CDC Guidelines, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Recommendations and Reports August 9, 2002 / Vol. 51 / No. RR-10 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||